Is it worth funding ICELE, asks Coleman
From:
Simon Smith
Date:
Apr 03 14:37 UTC
Short link
I'd love to see a real cost-benefit analysis too, Steven. The question is,
how do you do it?
Involve performed a useful literature review of attempts to evaluations of
public participation in policy-making, and concluded that "actual
cost-benefit analyses of participation are, as far as we have been able to
discern, virtually non-existent", largely due to the difficulty of
disaggregating intangible benefits like social capital and improved
relationships, or finding ways to taking into account the distribution of
costs and benefits, including to non-participants and society as a whole.
These can be very long-term, diffuse processes. See
http://www.involve.org.uk/civilrenewal
They call for some detailed economic appraisals of flagship projects which
would help develop criteria for analysing costs and benefits. Their focus
was not on eParticipation and eDemocracy, but the same difficulties surely
apply whether online or off.
Simon Smith
On 03/04/2008, Steven Clift <clift@publicus.net> wrote:
>
>
> At least in the UK, you are having a discussion about getting value for
> the investment, which means that from time to time your government, the BBC,
> the EU, etc. are actually investing in e-democracy.
>
> I know the sums are small, but I'd be interested in seeing at least 10% as
> much money "wasted" on e-democracy as has been dumped into one-way
> e-government service projects with minimal use. On that mark, you'd have the
> resources to learn many more lessons and make even more mistakes.
>
> In terms of research however, I would love to see some real cost-benefit
> analysis ... if a country had $100 million pounds to invest over 5 years to
> preserve and reform "democracy" in the online era (broadly conceived not
> just government to citizen democracy), what is the best investment. Or more
> importantly, if a local council or a local BBC station, had 20K GBP a year
> to invest in the community sector and 20K to invest for needs within their
> democratic services, what is the most cost-effective service? (My guess on
> the institutional side - a regularly produced "what's new" e-mail newsletter
> combined with a personalized e-mail/RSS alert system like Google News Alerts
> but instead covering local decision-making meetings/documents/news.)
>
> Steven Clift
>
> Member profile for Steven Clift:
> http://groups.dowire.org/contacts/stevenclift
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Group home for UK and Ireland E-Democracy Exchange:
> http://groups.dowire.org/groups/ukie
>
> Replies go to members of UK and Ireland E-Democracy Exchange with all
> posts on this topic here:
> http://groups.dowire.org/r/topic/2Us5bhRdDhsgQoIoFgczci
>
> For digest version or to leave UK and Ireland E-Democracy Exchange,
> email <email obscured>
> with "digest on" or "unsubscribe" in the *subject*.
>
> UK and Ireland E-Democracy Exchange is hosted by Democracies Online -
> http://dowire.org.
>