Building consensus online
From:
Robert Leming
Date:
Jan 28 02:01 UTC
Short link
Hey Steven,
My name is Bob Leming and I get called Lem.
By way of introduction I work with a partner in a small consulting company,
Communishare Consulting, here in Philadelphia. We are currently working
intensively with the American Friends Service Committee.
I have just brought my Dowire Profile up to date.
At the AFSC we are focused on the power of bringing together small groups of
5 or 6 for collaborative work & collaborative learning - and we are excited
with the results.
I will be very interested to hear the insights that others on this list have
re building a concensus across large groups.
One platform that provides tools that take steps in this direction is the
Actions Options Tool. This tool allows Activist Organizations to post
Actions that are then broadcast to all of the other Activists using the Tool
in that Region. Each organization is invited to vote on each Action. Votes
currently include Co-Sponsor, Participate, Support, No Support or Abstain.
To see the Tool in action see: www.ilcpj.org/actions/index.php?start=0&np=6
To learn more about the tool see: www.actionsoptions.org
The tool is being deployed across the Peace, Justice and Environment
Network: www.pjep.org
I am the volunteer facilitator for the Connecticut / Rhode Island PJ&E
Network, which is just starting to gain momentum.
A key is to have the facilitator stay in close touch with the activists in
the network and to stimulate participation - which can be labor intensive.
The goal of the project is to build first awareness and then
collaborationand concensus amongts the Activists in support of each others
work.
Bob Leming
Philadelphia
On Jan 26, 2008 8:38 AM, Steven Clift <> wrote:
>
> I've found that most online tools and techniques bring our differences of
> opinion rather than forging agreement within large groups online (over say
> 15 people). The Internet does a great job at getting issues on the table,
> allowing like-minds to coalase, and when done right builds respect among
> those with differing opinions.
>
> Can take this further?
>
> Let's say that we want move online from the statement of positions or
> surveys that show current opinions to agreement or consensus on actions or
> proposals among the vast majority of say 1,000 people.
>
> What would you do? What have you seen?
>
> Steven Clift
> E-Democracy.Org
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> http://stevenclift.com
> Sent via mobile: +1 612 203 5181
>
> Member profile for Steven Clift:
> http://groups.dowire.org/contacts/stevenclift
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Group home for Online Consultations, Dialogues, and E-Participation:
> http://groups.dowire.org/groups/consult
>
> Replies go to members of Online Consultations, Dialogues, and
> E-Participation with all posts on this topic here:
> http://groups.dowire.org/r/topic/2X3xwCn8JkN6YhoCoV6U0C
>
> For digest version or to leave Online Consultations, Dialogues, and
> E-Participation,
> email
> with "digest on" or "unsubscribe" in the *subject*.
>
> Online Consultations, Dialogues, and E-Participation is hosted by
> Democracies Online - http://dowire.org.
>
--
The wind and the waves favor the skilled sailor