Research into electronic government channel measurement
From:
Mick
Date:
Apr 20 13:18 UTC
Short link
I agree with you in some sense about channels when the Internet one can
be multiplied - I always supported the use of web-supported
intermediaries rather than the government's beloved CRM systems...
Also take point about innovation but one of the reasons is that they
can't make up their minds so we get CRM, digiTV, web(s) etc - there's
also an issue of trust, which isn't surprising! I agree about a central
resource - that was my comment about 157 & PSO's they got everybody
doing their own things and competing.
There's been little communication between academics & civil servants &
wider world, I agree - I wanted to do this after my research in 2000 but
e-government at a local level strained me enough as it was. I approached
one university but they weren't dynamic enough, then I found somone who
was and suffered heart failure in between...
I too have been hammering away at a regional level but as the saying
goes 'he who pays the piper calls the tune' and we've have to put up
with being bullied by certain people at the DCLG, Cabinet Office and
elsewhere, but this is an attempt to express all I learned in the last
eight years and bite back.
Mick - http://greatemancipator.wordpress.com
-----Original Message-----
From: paul canning [mailto:<email obscured>]
Sent: 20 April 2008 14:00
To: <email obscured>
Subject: Re: [UKIE-EDem] Research into electronic government channel
measurement
The problem I have with 'channels' is it's blunt usage. 'Web' is usually
seen as just one whereas actually it's multiple 'channels' - this is
more about reinventing the wheel rather than adopting industry norms
bugging me than anything else.
'I'm keen to see channel migration being done for the 'right' reasons'
The problem I always have with this is that government loves to be seen
to be 'innovating' - hence the relentless PR - but it's actually way
behind. I would be concerned about the digital divide and people like my
mum being forced online but there's a large, internalised reluctance to
face reality. Strategy is extremely patchy rather than holistic, hence
your project only happening now. This means less people using our online
channels than should be despite the now mass, majority use of the web
for a whole mass of services. The dissatisfaction in that sense almost
doesn't need measuring - it's obvious. What's needed is tools and
information for practitioners to improve processes, and they need to be
virtually copied from others who successfully run online processes. They
don't need to be replicated as if we're special in that regard: we're
not.
'Government has created (and funded) a divergent service delivery
culture by IEG's and PSO's and now wants to change it all.'
One of the reasons for this which I included in my blog post responding
to Tom Watson is 'who makes up eGov?' Dialogue just between academics
and civil servants will always result in a rather cozy worldview. There
just isn't any dialogue happening with the wider web. Jeremy, myself and
others working inside the machine are trying to do this but we are
pushing against the grain.
Member profile for paul canning:
http://groups.dowire.org/contacts/paulcanning
-----------------------------------------
Group home for UK and Ireland E-Democracy Exchange:
http://groups.dowire.org/groups/ukie
Replies go to members of UK and Ireland E-Democracy Exchange with all
posts on this topic here:
http://groups.dowire.org/r/topic/2m7LkwZrr45WQk2fLg9Z5t
For digest version or to leave UK and Ireland E-Democracy Exchange,
email <email obscured>
with "digest on" or "unsubscribe" in the *subject*.
UK and Ireland E-Democracy Exchange is hosted by Democracies Online -
http://dowire.org.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.2/1387 - Release Date:
19/04/2008 11:31
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.2/1387 - Release Date:
19/04/2008 11:31