Post in Public information review

Public information review From: Tom Steinberg Date: 2007 Apr 29 22:44 UTC Short link

Hello again all,

In case this thread wasn't long enough, I've come back to squeeze more
out of it :)

I've posted some more specific questions now on my blog:

http://steiny.typepad.com/premise/2007/04/searching_for_e.html

For those of you not in a link-clicking mood, here's what we're
hunting for now...

   1. Examples of places where civil servants or other public
officials successfully engage in other people's user-created sites?
(I'm loath to say in other people's discussions, because if they were
making useful additions to wikis, that'd be fine too).
   2. Examples of public servants who have been stopped from engaging
for what seem like either good or bad reasons.
   3. Examples, good or bad,  where governments gave either monetary
or other support to non-government user-created websites.  What did
they give? What did they get out of it?
   4. Stand out, clear-as-daylight examples of Uncontroversially Good
Things that happened when government officials did deign to contribute
to other people's sites. And vice versa.

I know this is blatant brain-power cadging, but what else are you
going to do on a Monday morning? ;)
    

Tom